🔗 Share this article

As the political power of Donald Trump diminishes and his behavior grows increasingly volatile, there has been an escalation in hostile rhetoric aimed at female journalists and racial minorities, including Somali immigrants being the latest target. The impact of these insults stems from the animosity behind them and his position, not any basis in truth. In a parallel manner, the government's actions against immigrants are poorly executed and driven by misinformation. The evidence makes it obvious that the objective is not targeting those who have committed crimes. The assault is directed at people of color.

From Native Americans carrying tribal IDs to American citizens by choice, from essential workers in construction and healthcare to those who served, university attendees, people in their own homes, and very young children: a wide array of the country's population is under siege.

"Immigration enforcement raids are cruel, unjust and do nothing for public safety," states a prominent New York City official. Scenes featuring officers concealing their faces breaking car glass and dragging parents away from infants, instilling fear and hindering the function of institutions, achieves the opposite effect.

These waves of orchestrated bigotry—directed at people from Haiti in the 2024 campaign, Venezuelans this year, and now Somalis—lean heavily on defamatory falsehoods and slurs. The reason is simple: the truthful data about these groups of people cannot support the animosity.

The Mythical White Nation Versus Actual History

This campaign of terror and demonization purports to aim at rebuilding a uniformly white United States that is a fantasy. While the US was demographically whiter in the youth of today's white supremacists, it never constituted a purely white nation. In 1776, the original thirteen colonies contained a substantial percentage of African and Native American individuals—certain states in the South were over one-third Black.

Following American expansion, taking Texas in the 1840s and acquiring northern Mexico in 1848, it incorporated a large community of Hispanic settlers already living across what is now the Southwestern U.S. and California. Historical records show the initial Muslim of African descent in territory that became the U.S. arrived with a Spanish exploration party nearly a century before the Mayflower English Puritans reached the shores of New England in 1620.

Population Truths Versus Coercive Fantasies

The persecution of huge populations of people of color and attempts at large-scale expulsion will not manufacture the all-white nation of extremist imagination. Los Angeles, for instance, is nearly half Latino, and regardless of aggressive enforcement, detentions and removals, its character persists. Its name itself is Spanish, an enduring reminder of who was there first.

All this hatred and oppression resembles the panic of bigots who pretend they can stop the coming changes of a country no longer majority-white by using pure cruelty.

This is paired with an attack on abortion access that is, sometimes, explicitly designed to encourage white women to bear more babies. The argument points to a fertility rate below replacement level in the US, a phenomenon less impactful than in other countries due to a young, industrious immigrant workforce that sustains the economy. However, rather than providing the social support that might make raising children easier, the strategy has been punitive and coercive.

An noted writer notes that the reproductive politics espoused by figures like JD Vance—along with insults aimed at women without children—constitute a form of pronatalism. This philosophy "typically merges worries about declining birth rates with opposition to immigration and anti-feminist ideas."

Similarly, reporting indicates that "efforts to bolster the birth rate do not compensate for broader policies aimed at slashing federal support programs like Medicaid and insurance for kids. This focus on families is not just for encouraging procreation. Rather, it is being weaponized to advance a conservative agenda that endangers the health of women, reproductive rights, and economic participation."

Contradictory Strategies and Widespread Resistance

The combination of anti-immigration and pro-birth policies constitute an effort to forcibly alter the nation's demographic trajectory. In the end, they represent foolish bullying by proponents of hate who inadvertently reveal that their claims to superiority must be rooted in race and gender; without these constructs, their arguments collapse into meaningless idiocy.

A lot of the reasoning offered by the Trump team does not match up with observable realities and real-world results. For example, naval operations in the Caribbean Sea frequently focus on small vessels which are not proven to be carrying narcotics and incapable of reaching US shores. Likewise, Venezuela's involvement in fentanyl trafficking is minimal, and its involvement with cocaine is far less than that of other South American nations.

The government's position extends to environmental policy, with a rejection of "climate change ideology" and "carbon neutrality targets." There is a sentimental attachment to coal and oil, especially coal mining, resulting in measures that force communities to invest in obsolete and toxic energy sources while sabotaging affordable, clean alternatives. Concurrently, public health leadership have advanced anti-scientific dietary schemes while eroding broader health protections.

The core premise of the attacks on immigrants is that non-white individuals born abroad are dangerous intruders. Yet, from coast to coast—in cities like L.A. and Charlotte, Chicago to Portland—the government's own forces, immigration enforcement personnel, whom local communities view as the dangerous and hostile interlopers.

No symbol is more powerful of the widespread rejection of this approach than the countless individuals organizing, protesting, facing danger and detention to defend their neighbors. City after city has stood up in defense of its residents. All the insults or intimidation can alter this fundamental truth.